| 547 | 16 | 174 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
通过土培试验接种4类丛枝菌根真菌,旨在研究其对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长和生理特性的影响。结果表明:仅在接种G.m2处理中紫花苜蓿幼苗的生长表现出明显的促进作用,且相比对照分别使其幼苗根系活力和叶片中叶绿素含量明显地增加了7.13%和41.84%(P<0.05);接种G.m2的紫花苜蓿幼苗在地上部分植物量、地下部分植物量、株高、根系中N、P元素的含量方面相比对照也分别明显提高了21.41%、7.47%、24.33%、11.63%、29.75%(P<0.05),且地上部分Ca的含量也有明显增加;接种G.m2后对紫花苜蓿的促生作用在生理特性上表现为幼苗根系活力和叶片中叶绿素含量的提高。
Abstract：A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of four types of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and physiological characteristics of alfalfa seedlings.The results showed that only alfalfa seedlings inoculated with G.m2 exhibited a positive effect on the growth and some physiological characteristics. Compared with CK, root activity of seedlings and chlorophyll content of leaves in alfalfa seedlings inoculated with G.m2 were significantly increased by 7.13% and 41.84% respectively(P<0.05).Compared with CK, aboveground biomass, root biomass, height of plant, nitrogen content in root, potassium content in root were also significantly increased by 21.41%, 7.47%, 24.33%, 11.63%, 29.75%(P<0.05), and the calcium content in shoot was also significantly increased.After inoculation with G.m2, the physiological characteristics of the growth promoting effect on alfalfa was performanced by promoting the root activity of seedlings and increasing chlorophyll content in leaves.
[1]Soto M J,Fernández-Aparicio M,Castellanos-Morales V,et al.First indications for the involvement of strigolactones on nodule formation in alfalfa(Medicago sativa)[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(02):383-385.
[2]王林娜,景春梅,张玲,等.不同种植年限紫花苜蓿和棉花轮作对土壤理化性质的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2017,54(08):1523-1530.
[3]Teng Y,Luo Y,Sun X,et al.Influence of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza andRhizobium on Phytoremediation by Alfalfa of an Agricultural Soil Contaminated with Weathered PCBs:A Field Study[J].International Journal of Phytoremediation,2010,12(05):516-533.
[4]Giridhar Babu A,Sudhakara Reddy M.Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth and nutrient status of bermudagrass grown in alkaline bauxite processing residue[J].Environmental Pollution,2011,159(01):25-29.
[5]陈志豪,刘学锋,鲍根生,等.内生真菌对高羊茅种子耐干旱能力的影响[J].塔里木大学学报,2016,28(02):12-17.
[6]何树斌,郭理想,李菁,等.丛枝菌根真菌与豆科植物共生体研究进展[J].草业学报,2017(01):187-194.
[7]李芳,张峰,高萍,等.农业生态系统中AM真菌、禾草内生真菌及病原菌互作[J].草业科学,2016(02):219-229.
[8]刘敏,峥嵘,白淑兰,等.丛枝菌根真菌物种多样性研究进展[J].微生物学通报,2016(08):1836-1843.
[9]周利承,曹梦珂,郑晨露,等.接种丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿修复石油污染土壤的潜在作用[J/OL].应用与环境生物学报,1-17[2020-05-08].
[10]邓杰,李芳,古丽君,等.不同土壤pH下AM真菌对苜蓿苗期生长的影响[J].草业科学,2019,36(11):2854-2862.
[11]才华,董理,邢易梅,等.丛枝菌根真菌对碱胁迫下紫花苜蓿耐碱性的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2019,50(10):40-46.
[12]于萌,张永帅,付伟,等.保水剂和丛枝菌根真菌异形根孢囊霉对紫花苜蓿生长与抗旱性的影响[J].菌物学报,2019,38(11):1976-1991.
[13]孙艳梅,张前兵,苗晓茸,等.解磷细菌和丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿生产性能及地下植物量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(13):2230-2242.
[14]吴澜,乌恩,钱洁鑫,等.不同改良剂对盐碱地苜蓿生长及丛枝菌根共生的影响[J].北方农业学报,2019,47(02):26-35.
[15]张永志,高文俊,郭艳妮,等.丛枝菌根真菌对NaCl胁迫下紫花苜蓿的生理指标及光合参数的影响[J].草原与草坪,2018,38(04):26-34.
[16]单明娟,秦华,陈俊辉,等.两种间作体系对丛枝菌根真菌侵染及多氯联苯去除的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(03):470-477.
[17]刘倩,高娅妮,柳旭,等.混合盐碱胁迫下接种丛枝菌根真菌和根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿生长的影响[J].生态学报,2018,38(17):6143-6155.
[18]盛萍萍,刘润进,李敏.丛枝菌根观察与侵染率测定方法的比较[J].菌物学报,2011(04):519-525.
[19]王倡宪,秦岭,冯固,等.三种丛枝菌根真菌对黄瓜幼苗生长的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2003(03):301-303.
[20]刘欢,姚拓,刘婷,等.不同丛枝菌根真菌对苜蓿生长的影响[J].草原与草坪,2017,37(04):61-67.
[21]刘忆,袁玲.根瘤菌和AM真菌对紫花苜蓿结瘤和产质量的影响[J/OL].土壤学报,1-7[2020-05-08].
[22]常青.石河子绿洲区大田苜蓿土壤AM真菌资源及促苜蓿生长效应的初步研究[D].石河子:石河子大学,2013.
[23]任爱天,鲁为华,杨洁晶,等.不同磷水平下AM真菌对紫花苜蓿生长和磷利用的影响[J].中国草地学报,2014,36(06):72-78.
[24]张延旭,毕银丽,郭楠,等.接种不同丛枝菌根真菌对黄花苜蓿生长影响[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(12):3815-3822.
[25]刘芳,景戍旋,胡健,等.镉污染和接种丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿生长和氮吸收的影响[J].草业学报,2017,26(02):69-77.
[26]黄晶,凌婉婷,孙艳娣,等.丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿吸收土壤中镉和锌的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2012,31(01):99-105.
[27]林子然,张英俊.丛枝菌根真菌和磷对干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿幼苗生长与生理特征的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(01):115-122.
[28]于洁,贾振宇,梁燕,等.丛枝菌根真菌接种对紫花苜蓿抗旱性的影响[J].中国草地学报,2016(05):13-18.
基本信息:
中图分类号:S541.9
引用信息:
[1]王栋,高军,艾琪,等.丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J].塔里木大学学报,2020,32(02):55-62.
基金信息:
新疆生产建设兵团塔里木畜牧科技重点实验室开放课题“接种丛枝菌根真菌对紫花苜蓿产量影响的研究”(HS201607);; 国家自然科学基金委员会地区科学基金项目“内生真菌提高宿主布顿大麦抗碱性生理机制研究”(31660689)
2020-04-24
2020
2020-05-19
2020-05-20
2020
1
2020-06-15
2020-06-15