| 194 | 1 | 226 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
纳入公众偏好的荒漠化治理价值评估是科学制定荒漠化治理政策的重要基础。本研究以新疆荒漠化治理价值评估为例,运用选择实验法研究公众对荒漠化治理的支付意愿和偏好异质性,并结合潜在分类模型分析受访者偏好异质性的形成机理。研究发现新疆公众对于荒漠化治理存在显著的偏好异质性,受访者可分为偏好正常型、环境友好型、价格敏感型3个潜在类别。其中,偏好正常型的受访者占比最大(68.17%),显著高于环境友好型(19.86%)和价格敏感型(11.97%);偏好正常型、环境友好型受访者对荒漠化治理属性的支付意愿大于价格敏感型受访者。分析潜在类别可知,公众的社会经济特征及环境感知对其偏好具有显著影响。较高的关注程度、治理意识和较低的年龄会促使受访者更加偏好于荒漠化环境属性的治理;收入水平、关注程度、治理意识较低的受访者,更不愿意支付较高的治理费用,在进行选择时更关注治理价格属性。研究有助于为完善当前和未来的荒漠化控制和管理提供理论依据和技术支撑,增强政策或项目的合理性和可行性。
Abstract:The evaluation of economic value of desertification control, which includes the consideration of public preferences, is an important basis for formulating scientifical desertification control policies. By examining the evaluation of desertification control in Xinjiang, this article employs the choice experiment method to investigate public willingness to pay and preference heterogeneity for desertification control, and introduces a latent class model to analyze the factors contributing to heterogeneous preferences among respondents. The results show that there is significant heterogeneity in preferences for desertification control among the general population of Xinjiang. Specifically, respondents can be divided into three latent class, which is named: preference-normal type, environment-friendly type, and price-sensitive type, respectively. Among them, the largest proportion of respondents(68.17%) belongs to the preference-normal type, which is significantly higher than those of the environment-friendly type(19.86%) and price-sensitive type(11.97%). The respondents categorized as preference-normal type and environment-friendly type exhibit higher willingness to pay for desertification control attributes. The results also reveal the relationship between public preferences and their socio-economic and environmental attitude characteristics. Specifically, respondents who are younger and with a higher level of concern and control consciousness tend to improve desertification control attributes, whereas respondents with a lower level of concern, control consciousness and income show a lower willingness to pay. The findings are helpful to provide theoretical basis and technical support for improving the current and future desertification control and management, which contribute to enhancing the rationality and feasibility of policies or projects.
[1] 金显玲,赵国蓉,谢媛,等.2000—2021年青海湖流域土地荒漠化时空变化分析[J].青海草业,2023,32(1):44-49.
[2] 农夫.荒漠化的危害[J].绿色中国,2017(5):66-70.
[3] 唐林川雄,杨洁,朱巧丽.我国土地荒漠化环境问题与对策研究[J].黑龙江环境通报,2022,35(2):97-99.
[4] 盖志毅.库布其沙漠治理:习近平生态文明思想指引下的生动实践[J].北方经济,2022(5):4-7.
[5] 杨喆,吴健.中国自然保护区的保护成本及其区域分布[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(4):839-852.
[6] 李军龙,邓祥征,张帆,等.激励相容理论视角下生态公益林补偿对农户的增收效应:以福建三明为例[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(12):2942-2955.
[7] 张宏巍,孔祥吉,卓凌,等.荒漠化防治视角下的自然公园规划设计策略研究:以杭锦后旗为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(10):147-152.
[8] 胡元辉,翟洪波.中国防沙治沙工作的思考[J].林草政策研究,2023,3(2):27-32.
[9] SARPARAST M,OWNEGH M,SEPEHR A.Evaluating the impacts of combating-action programs on desertification hazard trends:a case study of Taybad-Bakharz Region,northeastern Iran[J].Environ Sustain Indic,2020(7):100043.
[10] 杨俊杰.荒漠化灾害经济损失及防沙治沙工程效益评估:对全国荒漠化灾害经济损失和沽源县工程效益的评估[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
[11] 孙桂丽.玛纳斯县新湖农场植物治沙效益研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆师范大学,2008.
[12] 梁文英.鄂尔多斯沙产业效益研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2014.
[13] SUTTON P C,ANDERSON S J,COSTANZA R,et al.The ecological economics of land degradation:impacts on ecosystem service values[J].Ecol Econ,2016,129:182-192.
[14] AZIZ T.Changes in land use and ecosystem services values in Pakistan,1950—2050[J].Environ Dev,2021,37:100576.
[15] LIU Y,ZHANG R Q,MA X R,et al.Combined ecological and economic benefits of the solar photovoltaic industry in arid sandy ecosystems[J].J Clean Prod,2020,262:121376.
[16] 宁虎森,何苗,罗青红,等.新疆柽柳林生态服务功能及其价值评估分析[J].生态科学,2019,38(4):111-118.
[17] 崔桂鹏,肖春蕾,雷加强,等.大国治理:中国荒漠化防治的战略选择与未来愿景[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(7):943-955.
[18] 毛碧琦,敖长林,焦扬,等.基于选择实验的三江平原湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价及偏好异质性研究[J].生态学报,2017,37(4):1297-1308.
[19] 姚柳杨,赵敏娟,徐涛.耕地保护政策的社会福利分析:基于选择实验的非市场价值评估[J].农业经济问题,2017,38(2):32-40,41.
[20] RAKOTONARIVO O S,SCHAAFSMA M,HOCKLEY N.A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods[J].J Environ Manage,2016,183:98-109.
[21] 毛碧琦,敖长林,宁家靖,等.基于潜在分类模型的湿地生态系统服务公众生态偏好异质性研究[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(5):747-760.
[22] 张雪莹,张正勇,刘琳,等.新疆地形复杂度的空间格局及地理特征[J].地理研究,2022,41(10):2832-2850.
[23] 新疆维吾尔族防沙治沙领导小组.新疆荒漠化和沙化状况公报[J].新疆林业,2011(5):6-7.
[24] 郑德斌.基于选择实验的不确定性响应下空气质量价值评价方法与实证研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2022.
[25] 喻永红,刘耀森.农户休耕意愿及补偿方式偏好:基于重庆十区县农户的选择实验分析[J].农业经济,2022(1):93-97.
[26] 聂文静,薄慧敏,李太平.中国农产品质量分级的理论依据与福利评估:基于选择实验调查的福利评估[J].农业技术经济,2021(7):65-78.
[27] 潘顺.我国北方地区土地荒漠化时空分布特征分析[D].青岛:山东科技大学,2020.
[28] 昝国盛,王翠萍,李锋,等.第六次全国荒漠化和沙化调查主要结果及分析[J].林业资源管理,2023(1):1-7.
[29] CAI Y,ZHAO M J,SHI Y X,et al.Assessing restoration benefit of grassland ecosystem incorporating preference heterogeneity empirical data from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region[J].Ecol Indic,2020,117:106705.
[30] 岳胜如,周纪云,胡雪菲,等.2000—2018年新疆植被覆盖时空变化特征及驱动力分析[J].塔里木大学学报,2020,32(2):97-105.
[31] 吴瀚,白洁,李均力,等.新疆地区植被覆盖度时空变化及影响因素分析[J].植物生态学报,2024,48(1):41-55.
[32] 吴甜甜.空气污染对身心健康的影响[D].苏州:苏州大学,2017.
[33] KHAN S U,KHAN I,ZHAO M J,et al.Valuation of ecosystem services using choice experiment with preference heterogeneity:a benefit transfer analysis across inland river basin[J].Sci Total Environ,2019,679:126-135.
[34] 新疆维吾尔自治区生态环境厅.环境状况公报[R/OL].(2023-06-06)[2023-10-20].http://sthjt.xinjiang.gov.cn/xjepd/hjzkgb/common_list.shtml.
[35] 张克斌,杨晓晖.联合国全球千年生态系统评估:荒漠化状况评估概要[J].中国水土保持科学,2006,4(2):47-52.
[36] 新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.2021年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[R/OL].(2022-03-01)[2023-05-21].https://tjj.xinjiang.gov.cn/tjj/tjgn/202203/7ab304445f174a7eb1f5165be4f94041.shtml.
[37] 新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.统计公报[R/OL].(2022-03-01)[2023-05-25].https://tjj.xinjiang.gov.cn/tjj/tjgn/ist.shtml.
[38] BIROL E,KAROUSAKIS K,KOUNDOURI P.Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes:the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece[J].Ecol Econ,2006,60(1):145-156.
[39] 史恒通,赵敏娟.生态系统服务功能偏好异质性研究:基于渭河流域水资源支付意愿的分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(8):36-40.
[40] 贾亚娟,赵敏娟.纳入农户偏好的农村生活垃圾分类治理研究:基于选择实验法的实证分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(6):91-103.
[41] 王芳,李宁.赋权·认同·合作:农村生态环境参与式治理实现策略:基于计划行为理论的研究[J].广西社会科学,2021(2):49-55.
[42] 王名,邢宇宙.多元共治视角下我国环境治理体制重构探析[J].思想战线,2016,42(4):158-162.
[43] LI C Q,ZHAO M J,SHI Y X.Farmers’ preferences for diversifying compensation policy for mulch film pollution control:a discrete choice experiment in Northwest China[J].J Clean Prod,2023,416:137962.
[44] 陈晖.区域技术市场供需结构对创新产出的影响研究[D].南宁:广西大学,2021.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X171
引用信息:
[1]张玉柔,毛碧琦,唐玉荣,等.荒漠化治理价值评估及公众偏好研究——以新疆地区为例[J].塔里木大学学报,2024,36(04):73-85.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(72104171); 塔里木大学校长基金博士人才项目(TDZKBS202108)
2023-11-09
2023
2024-01-07
2024-03-12
2024
1
2024-12-15
2024-12-15